Cost-effect_and_budg_impact_analysis_of_viscosupplementation_with_hylan_G-F_20-1.jpg

(The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of viscosupplementation compared with conventional support therapy (CST - eg, NSAIDs and acetaminophen

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 for knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Article specifications

This original article was published in 2019 in Journal of Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. (IF2013: 2.83) by Italian and Britannia specialists. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of viscosupplementation with one intra-articular (IA) injection of 6 mL hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One®) and with three injections of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc®3×2) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients compared with conventional support therapy (CST - eg, NSAIDs and acetaminophen) and the cost-effectiveness of one IA injection of 2 mL hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc®1×2) in hip OA patients compared with CST from an Italian Health System perspective.

 

Results

Hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL/hylan G-F 20 is a cost-effectiveness treatment compared to NSAIDs and acetaminophen in the treatment of knee/hip OA in Italy. The treatment of hip and knee OA resulted in cost-saving with hylan G-F 20 1×2 mL and economically sustainable with hylan G-F 20 1×6 mL. However, Real Word Evidence studies should be conducted in order to estimate costs associated with both prosthetics and to understand the reduction of physiotherapy and medication due to hylan G-F 20.

Tags: Italy Britain Original research 2019 Clinicoecon Outcomes Res

Hayland Center

© 2018 HYLAND.CENTER ALL RIGHTS RESERVED